日本語
한국어
Tiếng Việt
简体中文
The passage of last year’s GENIUS Act fundamentally shifted the landscape for digital assets, solidifying stablecoins’ legitimacy and paving the way for blockchain technology’s integration into traditional finance, payments, and investments. According to Mark Nichols, a principal and digital assets consulting leader at Ernst & Young, the banking sector, save for the smallest local entities, can no longer overlook these transformative changes. Nichols anticipates a surging demand for the inherent security, unparalleled speed, and 24/7 accessibility that blockchain offers to financial services.
Stablecoins: The Linchpin of Digital Finance
Nichols foresees a future where an increasing volume of assets undergoes ‘tokenization’ – converting them into digital assets that transact over blockchain networks instead of conventional financial systems. Crucially, many of these transactions will necessitate seamless movement between blockchain environments and the traditional commercial sphere.
Nichols aptly describes stablecoins as “the glue” facilitating this interoperability. He elaborates, “Whether you’re engaging in on-chain transactions, purchasing cryptocurrencies, or acquiring a tokenized U.S. Treasury security, you require a payment instrument.” This pivotal role will also extend to tokenized deposits and, eventually, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) where they emerge.
Ignoring Digital Assets Puts Banks at Risk
While the precise digital asset strategy will naturally differ based on a bank’s size, scope, and specializations, Nichols unequivocally warns that inaction will lead to significant customer attrition. Both corporate clients and individual consumers are rapidly gravitating towards these new digital technologies.
Recent EY global research underscores this trend:
- Businesses: A staggering 13% of large corporations and financial institutions are already utilizing stablecoins. Furthermore, an impressive 54% of non-users anticipate adopting them by the close of 2026. Significantly, one in ten corporate users reported tangible savings on banking fees through blockchain adoption.
- Consumers: The appeal is equally strong among younger demographics. Millennials and Gen Z exhibit growing interest in cryptocurrency, with an estimated 65 million American adults now holding some form of digital currency.
How Banks Can Seize the Digital Opportunity
As stablecoins gain traction following the GENIUS Act, fintechs and non-financial entities have often taken center stage. However, Nichols advises banks against a ‘wait and see’ approach, particularly concerning pending legislation. He asserts that federal financial regulators, including banking agencies, the SEC, and the CFTC, possess ample existing authority to facilitate blockchain technology’s growth.
Indeed, banks are uniquely positioned to lead this evolution. Nichols stresses, “Banks are regulated entities, and they are trusted entities.” He adds, “Society broadly believes in the value that banks bring. Companies definitely understand them, and the services they can provide. They can be a central pillar in providing safe and sound access to on-chain finance.”
Mastering the Digital Asset Wallet
To remain central, banks must master the digital asset wallet, which Nichols defines broadly as the blockchain/crypto equivalent of a traditional bank account. This ‘wallet’ will serve as the primary access point for companies and consumers to engage with credit, payments, investments, insurance, identity, and even health records within the blockchain ecosystem.
By providing these essential account relationships, banks can preserve their prominence and act as the crucial bridge between conventional and emerging digital financial worlds. Failure to do so risks relegation to irrelevance, Nichols cautions. He emphasizes that a significant challenge and differentiator lies in ensuring “interoperability” between digital-native and traditional assets.
A core objective, according to Nichols, is to avoid “fragmented liquidity.” He insists that an asset should hold the same value regardless of whether it resides on-chain or off-chain – be it a Treasury security or Apple stock. For instance, he illustrates: “If I hold a traditional U.S. Treasury in my brokerage account and wish to leverage it for financing in the decentralized finance (DeFi) blockchain world, I should seamlessly transfer it for on-chain activity.” This enables near-instantaneous loan applications, approvals, and funding, often facilitated by stablecoins.
Evolving Customer Engagement and Business Models
As this digital transformation unfolds, where can banks effectively engage their customer base? Nichols offers specific scenarios:
- Wealth Management: Banks specializing in wealth management can empower clients to invest directly via blockchain, with straightforward mechanisms to convert proceeds back into fiat currency.
- Business Banking: Business-focused banks must equip companies to transact using stablecoins and other digital payment methods. Treasury management services, in particular, will demand robust ‘on-ramps’ for digital assets.
Customer experience will be paramount. Nichols highlights that customers will prioritize seamless movement into and out of blockchain transactions. This shift also signals a profound change in business models. Nichols warns that existing revenue streams, such as those from wire transfers, will likely be supplanted by significantly cheaper or free blockchain-based alternatives. He views this as an unavoidable evolution, drawing parallels to the dramatic reduction in stock trading costs.
The Path Forward: Timeframe and Action for Banks
Nichols anticipates that the adoption of blockchain, tokenization, and stablecoin technology will unfold as a series of distinct waves across various financial services sectors, rather than a single, monolithic surge. Currently, the investment domain is experiencing significant acceleration, exemplified by the New York Stock Exchange’s initiative to develop 24/7 trading for tokenized securities.
While other areas may evolve more gradually, Nichols projects a three-to-five-year timeline for these trends to achieve widespread scale. He also expects “parallelism” to persist, with both traditional and blockchain ecosystems coexisting even by the end of the decade, despite a projected shift towards the latter. “I don’t think we’ll be fully off traditional financial infrastructure,” he states, acknowledging that while substantial activity will migrate, a considerable portion will remain conventional.
For banks, particularly smaller institutions that have observed from the sidelines, Nichols advises proactive engagement. He recommends exploring strategic partnerships, emphasizing that “it doesn’t require crazy investments for everybody” nor does every bank need to develop proprietary solutions. A crucial step for early adopters is to assess and ensure core system compatibility for operating seamlessly in both traditional and digital financial realms. The overarching message is clear: “Every financial institution has to have a digital asset strategy” – ignoring this challenge is no longer an option.
Source: thefinancialbrand.com