日本語
한국어
Tiếng Việt
简体中文
A crucial piece of security footage from Jeffrey Epstein’s jail unit has just been released, directly challenging Attorney General Pam Bondi’s prior explanation for a mysterious one-minute gap in previously public video. This newly surfaced segment is part of a larger, controversial online data drop, reigniting intense public debate surrounding Epstein’s death.
The Elusive ‘Missing Minute’ Explained
Back in July, when the Justice Department and the FBI first released nearly 11 hours of surveillance video from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), a critical one-minute segment was notably absent. This gap occurred just hours before Epstein was found dead in August 2019.
At the time, then-Attorney General Pam Bondi attributed the omission to a routine system reset, claiming security cameras automatically cut out for one minute each night. However, this explanation faced immediate skepticism, particularly after forensic analysis suggested the original video had been edited multiple times, sparking outrage among those following the case closely.
What the New Footage Reveals
The recently released surveillance footage, part of a substantial online data dump, fills the notorious minute between 11:59 p.m. on August 9, 2019, and midnight on August 10, 2019. While the acquisition of this missing piece is significant, the visual content itself appears to offer little in the way of groundbreaking revelations concerning Epstein’s immediate vicinity.
The extra minute, embedded within an additional two hours of footage, primarily shows several guards working near Epstein’s cell. Beyond this, the broader release on Tuesday also includes scenes of Epstein being escorted through the detention center to make a phone call, as reported by CBS.
Jeffrey Epstein’s death in a New York City jail cell in August 2019 was officially ruled a suicide. Despite extensive investigations by the FBI, which concluded no one entered or left the area where Epstein was held, the release of this long-sought minute has breathed new life into online discussions and conspiracy theories challenging the official narrative.
The Controversial File Dump: “Only 3 Percent Fresh”
Beyond the prison video, the epic file dump—disseminated via Google Drive and Dropbox—contained a vast array of materials, including documents, audio recordings, emails, and court filings. However, the sheer volume has been met with significant criticism regarding its actual novelty.
Representative Robert Garcia, the Committee’s ranking Democrat, stated that the only genuinely new information among the thousands of pages comprised fewer than 1,000 pages from Customs and Border Protection logs detailing Epstein’s private plane flight locations from 2000 to 2014, alongside related re-entry forms to the U.S.
Garcia directly challenged Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, accusing him of a “spectacle” rather than a substantive release. “The 33,000 pages of Epstein documents James Comer has decided to ‘release’ were already mostly public information. To the American people – don’t let this fool you,” Garcia remarked in a Tuesday statement.
His team’s analysis concluded that a mere 3 percent of the entire document dump contained any new information. “There is no mention of any client list or anything that improves transparency or justice for victims. House Republicans are trying to make a spectacle of releasing already-public documents,” Garcia emphasized.
Calls for Transparency and the ‘Client List’
The demand for full disclosure continues to intensify, with particular focus on the elusive “client list.” Rep. Garcia reiterated, “Pam Bondi has said the client list was on her desk. She could release it right now if she wanted to… Pam Bondi must comply with our subpoena immediately, and release all of the documents. The American people demand it.”
Garcia further alleged that most of the files released this week had been circulated to “right-wing influencers back in February,” urging, “Release all the files NOW.”
Even Republican Representative Thomas Massie, known for his critical stance against the former President, speculated that the administration might be selectively releasing files to shield influential friends. “I actually don’t think he’s done anything criminal,” Massie stated on MSNBC, “I think he may be covering for some rich and powerful people that are friends of his.”
Massie highlighted the personal stakes, noting, “In fact, some of those billionaires are running ads against me in Kentucky right now. One of them is in Epstein’s black book. So, we’re getting close to the center of power here. Embarrassment is not a reason to conceal all of this stuff. We’ve got to get it out in the open, regardless of whose friends might be incriminated.”
Democratic Congressman Jim McGovern echoed these sentiments on X, asserting, “Fact check: nearly everything Republicans just supposedly ‘released’… has already been released. They are doing everything in their power to muddy the waters. RELEASE. THE. FILES.”