AI Watermark Remover Sparks Debate

Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash and Watermark Removal

Google’s new Gemini 2.0 Flash AI model has stirred controversy. Users have discovered its ability to remove watermarks from images, including those from stock media providers like Getty Images. This feature is part of Gemini 2.0 Flash’s image generation capability, designed for native image creation and editing.

The Capabilities of Gemini 2.0 Flash

The Gemini 2.0 Flash model, now more widely accessible, showcases powerful image manipulation capabilities. However, concerns arise from its apparent lack of restrictions. The AI can generate images of celebrities and copyrighted characters without complaint, and, notably, it can remove watermarks from existing photos.

See how users are reacting on X.

How the Watermark Removal Works

As noted by users on platforms like X and Reddit, Gemini 2.0 Flash doesn’t just remove watermarks. It also attempts to fill in any gaps left behind. While other AI tools offer similar functionality, Gemini 2.0 Flash stands out for its proficiency and ease of access.

Explore the capabilities in Google’s AI studio.

Limitations and Disclaimers

Google has labeled Gemini 2.0 Flash’s image generation feature as “experimental” and “not for production use.” It’s currently available in developer-focused tools like AI Studio. The model isn’t perfect; it struggles with semi-transparent watermarks or those covering large image areas.

Ethical and Legal Concerns

Despite its limitations, the model’s capabilities raise concerns among copyright holders. Some AI models, like Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonnet and OpenAI’s GPT-4o, explicitly refuse to remove watermarks, citing ethical and legal reasons. Claude, for instance, deems it “unethical and potentially illegal.”

Removing a watermark without permission may violate U.S. copyright law, barring specific exceptions. For organizations seeking ethical AI solutions, Custom Software Development with Evotek ensures responsible implementation.
Contact us to learn more.

Google’s Response

Google has not yet commented on the issue.