日本語
한국어
Tiếng Việt
简体中文
The AI landscape has witnessed a dramatic collapse as Builder.ai, once valued at $1.5 billion, faces bankruptcy. The company, founded by Sachin Dev Duggal, is accused of misleading investors by allegedly using Indian developers to mimic AI capabilities.
The Rise and Fall of Builder.ai
Builder.ai, formerly known as Engineer.ai, promised a revolutionary platform where non-engineers could build applications as easily as “ordering a pizza.” This vision attracted significant investment, including backing from SoftBank, Microsoft, and the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), amassing over $445 million in funding over eight years.
However, reports surfaced indicating that the company’s AI was largely a facade. A 2019 Wall Street Journal article highlighted that the platform heavily relied on human developers, primarily from India, to perform tasks marketed as AI-driven.
Fraud Allegations and Investor Backlash
Accusations of inflated revenue figures and misleading investors have plagued Builder.ai. As the truth emerged, investors reportedly froze $37 million of the remaining $50 million investment. The company’s financial woes were compounded by government restrictions on capital outflow, leaving Builder.ai unable to meet its financial obligations.
Sachin Dev Duggal stepped down as CEO in February, with Manpreet Ratia brought in to manage the fallout. However, the damage was done, leading to the company’s bankruptcy filing and leaving its website inaccessible.
The Aftermath and Lessons Learned
Builder.ai’s collapse has sent shockwaves through the AI startup ecosystem. The incident underscores the importance of due diligence and the risks associated with “AI washing” – the practice of overstating AI capabilities to attract investment.
Despite the setback, the low-code/no-code market remains promising, with Gartner predicting significant growth in the coming years. However, Builder.ai’s story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of hype and the critical need for substance over marketing.
The case also highlights the potential for exploitation within the tech industry, with allegations of underpaid developers being used to create the illusion of advanced AI technology.
Sources: