日本語
한국어
Tiếng Việt
简体中文
The banking sector is at a pivotal juncture, largely due to the increasing legitimacy of stablecoins, cemented by legislation like the GENIUS Act. This marks a profound shift for digital assets and the integration of blockchain technology into conventional finance, payments, and investment frameworks. Experts suggest that nearly all financial institutions, save for the very smallest, can no longer afford to disregard these transformative changes.
Mark Nichols, Principal and Digital Assets Consulting Leader at Ernst & Young, articulates this pressing reality. He foresees a growing demand for the inherent security, speed, and continuous availability that blockchain technology offers financial services.
Stablecoins: The Essential Bridge for Digital Finance
Nichols emphasizes that stablecoins are the primary catalyst driving this evolution. He predicts a future where an increasing volume of assets will be ‘tokenized’ — converted into digital assets that transact via blockchain networks, bypassing traditional financial rails. Furthermore, seamless movement between blockchain ecosystems and the conventional commercial world will be crucial.
“Stablecoins serve as the vital link between these two realms,” Nichols asserts. He elaborates, “Whether you’re executing on-chain transactions, acquiring cryptocurrency, or purchasing a tokenized U.S. Treasury security, you need a reliable medium for payment.” Tokenized deposits and, where applicable, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will also fulfill this critical function.
Ignoring Digital Assets Puts Banks at Risk
While the specific approach to digital asset strategy will naturally vary based on a bank’s size, scope, and specialization, Nichols firmly believes that inaction poses a significant threat. Banks that fail to adapt risk losing valuable customer accounts as both corporate clients and individual consumers increasingly gravitate toward these emerging technologies.
Key Insights for Financial Institutions:
- Business Adoption: EY’s global research from last fall revealed that 13% of large corporations and financial institutions are already leveraging stablecoins. A substantial 54% of non-users expect to adopt stablecoins by the end of 2026.
- Significantly, one in ten corporate users surveyed reported cost savings on banking fees attributed to blockchain usage.
- Consumer Interest: Nichols highlights surging interest in cryptocurrency among millennials and Gen Z. Currently, approximately 65 million American adults hold some form of crypto asset.
Banks’ Opportunity in the Evolving Stablecoin Landscape
Fintechs and other non-financial entities have often dominated the spotlight as stablecoins gained traction following the GENIUS Act. Ongoing legislative debates, such as those surrounding the proposed “CLARITY Act,” continue.
Proactive Stance: Nichols urges banks not to wait for further legislative action from Washington. He argues that existing federal financial regulators — including banking agencies, the SEC, and the CFTC — possess ample authority through current powers and rulemaking capabilities to foster the growth and adoption of blockchain technology.
Banks as Trusted Pillars: Banks are uniquely positioned to play a central role in this digital transformation. “Banks are regulated entities, and crucially, they are trusted entities,” Nichols states. “Society generally values the contributions banks make. Businesses particularly comprehend their services. Banks can become a cornerstone in facilitating safe and secure access to on-chain finance.”
The Digital Asset Wallet: Central to Maintaining Bank Relevancy
The core of any successful bank strategy, according to Nichols, lies in providing the digital asset wallets that businesses and consumers will use. These wallets will facilitate access to credit, payments, investments, and even centralize insurance, identity, and health records within the blockchain ecosystem. He views this as providing the blockchain/crypto equivalent of a traditional bank account (using “wallet” in a broad, conceptual sense, beyond just a mobile app feature).
By retaining this core account relationship, banks can preserve their prominence and serve as the crucial bridge between parallel financial worlds. Conversely, ceding this function to other parties risks banks sliding into irrelevance.
“In a world featuring both natively digital and traditional asset forms, ensuring seamless interoperability is a significant challenge,” Nichols explains, underscoring its role as a key differentiator.
Preserving Liquidity: A crucial objective is to prevent liquidity fragmentation. “We want to avoid a scenario where an on-chain asset has one valuation, while its off-chain counterpart has a different one,” says Nichols. “If it’s the same underlying asset, its value should remain consistent across different technological forms,” whether it’s a Treasury security or Apple stock.
For instance, if a traditional U.S. Treasury security held in a brokerage account needs to secure financing in the decentralized finance (DeFi) world, Nichols envisions effortless movement of that asset into on-chain activity. Such loans could be swiftly applied for, granted, and funded using stablecoins.
Meeting Customer Needs in a Digital Era: Nichols provides two practical examples:
- A wealth management bank can empower clients to invest via blockchain, seamlessly converting proceeds back into fiat currency.
- A business-focused bank must equip companies to transact with stablecoins and other digital payment methods. Treasury management services will increasingly require robust on-ramps for digital assets.
Superior Customer Experience: Nichols stresses that ease of movement into and out of blockchain transactions will be a paramount factor for customer satisfaction.
Evolving Business Models: Nichols cautions that many current revenue streams, such as wire transfers, will inevitably be supplanted by cheaper or free blockchain alternatives. He sees this as an unavoidable progression as technology and finance converge, akin to the historical dramatic drop in stock trading fees.
The Digital Transformation Timeline
Nichols anticipates that blockchain, tokenization, and stablecoin technologies will be adopted across financial services in a phased manner, rather than a single massive wave. Investment-focused applications are currently experiencing a ramp-up, exemplified by the NYSE’s initiative to develop a blockchain process for 24/7 tokenized securities trading.
Other aspects will evolve more gradually, but Nichols considers “gradually” a relative term, projecting a three-to-five-year timeframe for these trends to achieve significant scale.
Coexistence and Parallelism: Even by the end of the decade, when Nichols expects the balance to have shifted considerably towards blockchain, both traditional and digital ecosystems will continue to coexist. “I don’t foresee us completely abandoning traditional financial infrastructure,” he notes. “While much activity will migrate, a substantial portion will also remain within existing systems.”
What Banks Must Do: While larger institutions have already ventured into these technologies, many smaller players have remained on the sidelines. Nichols recommends exploring partnerships, emphasizing that banks don’t need to invent entirely new processes. “It doesn’t necessitate exorbitant investments for everyone,” he adds.
Core System Compatibility: For early adopters, a crucial step is ensuring that core banking systems are compatible with operations in both the traditional and digital financial worlds.
Ultimately, the challenge is undeniable: “Every financial institution must develop a comprehensive digital asset strategy.”
Source: Thefinancialbrand.com