日本語
한국어
Tiếng Việt
简体中文
Silicon Valley, the heart of American innovation, faces an escalating threat from foreign adversaries employing sophisticated espionage tactics, including so-called “sex warfare.” Industry insiders reveal that operatives from countries like China and Russia are deploying attractive individuals to seduce and compromise US tech professionals, often leading to deep personal relationships, marriage, and even starting families, all to gain access to invaluable technological secrets.
James Mulvenon, Chief Intelligence Officer at Pamir Consulting, a firm specializing in risk assessments for American businesses investing in China, shared his personal experience of being targeted. He noted a recent surge in “very sophisticated LinkedIn requests from the same type of attractive young Chinese woman,” indicating a heightened and coordinated effort. Mulvenon also recounted an incident where two attractive Chinese women attempted to infiltrate a business conference on Chinese investment risks, possessing detailed information about the private event.
“It is a phenomenon. And I will tell you: it is weird,” Mulvenon stated, highlighting the unconventional nature of these operations. He emphasized that this “honeytrap” strategy exploits a significant vulnerability in the US. “We, by statute and by culture, do not do that. So they have an asymmetric advantage when it comes to sex warfare,” he explained.
Beyond Seduction: A “Whole-of-Society” Espionage Approach
The use of seduction is just one facet of a multi-pronged attack on American tech. Counterintelligence experts confirm that China, in particular, employs a “whole-of-society approach” to exploit US technology and talent. This involves not only trained agents but also ordinary citizens—such as investors, crypto analysts, businesspeople, and academics—making the espionage significantly harder to detect.
One former counterintelligence official recounted investigating a case involving a “beautiful” Russian woman who married an American colleague at an aerospace company. The investigation revealed she had attended a modeling academy, then a “Russian soft-power school,” before resurfacing in the US as a cryptocurrency expert. “She is trying to get to the heights of the military-space innovation community. The husband’s totally oblivious,” the official noted, adding that “showing up, marrying a target, having kids with a target — and conducting a lifelong collection operation, it’s very uncomfortable to think about but it’s so prevalent.”
The Financial Cost of Stolen Intellectual Property
The theft of American intellectual property (IP) and trade secrets carries a staggering cost, estimated at up to $600 billion annually. China is consistently identified as the primary perpetrator of these economic losses, which have serious national security implications.
A notable case in 2023 involved Klaus Pflugbeil, a China resident, who attempted to sell stolen Tesla intellectual property to undercover agents for $15 million. Pflugbeil, a former employee of a company acquired by Tesla, sought to use these trade secrets to establish a rival business in China. He was sentenced to 24 months in prison, while his alleged accomplice remains at large.
Assistant Attorney-General for National Security, Matthew Olsen, underscored the severity of such actions, stating, “In stealing trade secrets from an American electric-vehicle manufacturer to use in his own China-based company, Pflugbeil’s actions stood to benefit the PRC [People’s Republic of China] in a critical industry with national security implications.”
Exploiting US Openness: Pitch Competitions and Investment Strategies
Foreign entities are also exploiting open innovation ecosystems. The US government has issued warnings about international “pitch competitions” where startups present business ideas to Chinese investors. While offering cash awards and investment, these competitions often come with conditions: startups must bring their IP to China and establish operations there. Some even demand sharing sensitive business strategies, personal data, and photos before participation.
A senior US counterintelligence official cautioned against these events, explaining, “Part of it is a counterintelligence risk. They’re looking at how they can exploit you later. And part of it is they may simply take your idea, exploit it and patent it, stealing your financial future.” Academics and young innovators, eager to develop their ideas, are particularly susceptible.
Another concerning tactic, termed “drafting” by James Mulvenon, involves China-backed venture capitalists targeting US startups initially funded by the Department of Defence (DoD). By making strategic investments that push foreign ownership above a certain threshold, they can effectively block further DoD funding, denying the US government access to innovative technologies and intellectual property.
A May Senate committee report revealed that six of the 25 largest recipients of federal funding via the Small Business Innovation Research program, including nearly $180 million from the Pentagon in 2023 and 2024, had “clear links” to China.
The “Wild West” of Corporate Espionage
Jeff Stoff, a security academic and former US government analyst, describes the current landscape as “the Wild West.” He notes that much of China’s activity, while harmful to US interests, often operates within legal “regulatory blind spots.” “The Chinese understand our system and they know how to work within it with virtual impunity — most of the time,” Stoff explained.
America’s counterintelligence community faces the arduous task of catching up. This demands increased investment in combating corporate espionage, stringent scrutiny of “cross-border” funds, and heightened awareness of the pervasive Russian and Chinese threat across Silicon Valley’s dynamic ecosystem.
“China is targeting our startups, our academic institutions, our innovators, our DoD-funded research projects. But there’s not enough oversight and action. It’s all intertwined as part of China’s economic warfare strategy, and we’ve not even entered the battlefield,” Stoff warned, underscoring the urgent need for a more robust defense against these sophisticated and often insidious forms of foreign espionage.